Last Updated on March 9, 2026
Let's Pass Your Prop Firm Challenge
We take the burden of passing prop firm evaluations and handle your challenge passing of both phases within 1 month. Contact us today.
Finding an easy to pass prop firm in 2026 is a priority for traders who want to reach funded status without repeated costly failures. The industry average pass rate sits between 5% and 10%. However, certain firms consistently produce better results. They do so through more forgiving rules, static drawdown structures, and lower per-phase profit targets. This guide identifies the best easy to pass prop firm options available right now. It also explains which specific rule features make the biggest difference to your chances of success.
What Makes a Prop Firm Easy To Pass In 2026?
No prop firm evaluation is simple. However, certain rule structures give traders a significantly higher probability of success. The key factors are the drawdown method, the profit target per phase, time limits, and the minimum trading day requirement. Static drawdowns are more forgiving than intraday trailing ones. Specifically, your account does not breach during a temporary move that recovers by close. Similarly, firms with no time limit allow traders to wait for quality setups. In contrast, deadline pressure is one of the most cited causes of evaluation failures industry-wide.
Prop Firms That Are Easy To Pass In 2026
The four firms below stand out for their trader-friendly rules and verified payout histories. Therefore, they represent the best starting points for traders seeking an easy to pass prop firm in 2026. Always confirm current terms directly with each firm before purchasing.
1. FundedNext StellarĀ
FundedNext offers some of the most beginner-friendly evaluation rules in 2026. The Stellar 2-Step challenge has no time limit and no consistency rule on CFD accounts. Furthermore, it permits news trading throughout the evaluation. Phase 1 requires 8% profit. Phase 2 drops to just 4%. Both phases use a static 10% overall drawdown with no daily loss ceiling. The minimum is only 5 trading days per phase. Additionally, FundedNext offers a 15% profit reward from the challenge phase on qualifying plans. The firm holds a 4.5 out of 5 Trustpilot rating from over 57,000 reviews. Accounts scale to 4,000,000 USD and profit splits start at 80%. They rise to 95% with the Lifetime Payout add-on. Notably, scale-up criteria changed on January 12, 2026. Therefore, confirm which ruleset applies to your account before purchasing.
2. FTMO Standard
FTMO is widely considered the benchmark for fair evaluation design. Founded in 2015, it holds a 4.8 out of 5 Trustpilot score. It uses a fixed drawdown calculated from the initial balance. Consequently, the drawdown floor does not rise as your account grows. This gives you a stable and predictable risk boundary throughout the challenge. Phase 1 requires 10% profit. Phase 2 requires 5%. Both phases have no time limit and a minimum of just 4 trading days. Moreover, weekend holding and news trading are permitted during the evaluation. The challenge fee is fully refunded with the first payout. Profit splits start at 80% and rise to 90% after the first reward. Note, however, that FTMO does not currently accept clients from the United States.
3. The5ers High StakesĀ
The5ers has operated since 2016. As a result, it holds one of the longest verified track records in retail prop trading. Its High Stakes program starts at just 39 USD for a 5,000 USD account. Phase 1 requires 8% profit and Phase 2 requires 5%. Both phases use a static 5% daily and 10% overall drawdown with no time constraints. Because the drawdown does not trail upward, early gains create a stable floor for the rest of the challenge. The challenge fee is refunded after the first successful payout. Furthermore, the Bootcamp program splits the evaluation into three smaller phases. This reduces the difficulty for traders who find single-phase targets hard to maintain. The platform operates exclusively on MT5. Profit splits scale from 80% to 100%.
4. Funding Pips 2-Step Pro
Funding Pips was founded in 2020 and is based in Dubai. It starts at just 29 USD for a 5,000 USD account. Its 2-Step Pro challenge uses a static 6% daily drawdown. In contrast to trailing drawdowns, this provides more intraday breathing room. Phase 1 requires 8% profit and Phase 2 requires 5%. There is no time limit on either phase. Additionally, traders who reach their fourth successful payout receive a full evaluation fee refund. The firm holds a 4.5 out of 5 Trustpilot rating from 39,000 or more reviews. It has also distributed over 180 million USD in verified payouts. Supported platforms include MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker. Importantly, post-funding Pro accounts carry a 45% consistency requirement. This rule does not apply during the evaluation. Therefore, reading the funded account terms before starting is essential.
Easy To Pass Prop Firm Comparison Table 2026
| Prop Firm | Eval Steps | Profit Target | Drawdown Type | Time Limit |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FundedNext Stellar 2-Step | 2-Step | 8% / 4% | Static 10% max | None |
| FTMO Standard | 2-Step | 10% / 5% | Fixed from initial balance | None |
| The5ers High Stakes | 2-Step | 8% / 5% | Static 5% daily / 10% max | None |
| Funding Pips 2-Step Pro | 2-Step | 8% / 5% | Static 6% daily | None |
Key Features That Make Prop Firms Easier To Pass
- Static drawdown: Fixed from the initial balance, not a moving high-water mark. The floor stays the same even as profits grow, giving a clear and stable risk boundary.
- No time limit: Traders can wait for genuine setups rather than forcing trades under deadline pressure, reducing the most common cause of evaluation failure.
- No consistency rule: Firms that do not restrict how much profit can come from a single day give traders significantly more tactical flexibility.
- News trading permitted: Restrictions on high-impact events reduce opportunity and increase the risk of being caught in a volatility spike during the evaluation.
- Low minimum trading days: A requirement of 2 to 5 days is far easier to meet than requirements of 10 or more active trading days.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the overall prop firm pass rate in 2026?
Industry data places the average pass rate at 5% to 10%. Specifically, an FPFX Tech analysis of over 300,000 accounts found that only 14% of traders pass any challenge. Furthermore, just 7% ever reach a payout. The firms reviewed above produce above-average results. They do so by using more forgiving rule structures than the industry standard.
Is a one-step evaluation easier to pass than a two-step?
Not always. One-step evaluations often carry higher profit targets, such as 10% in a single phase. They also tend to use tighter drawdown limits to compensate. In contrast, two-step evaluations split the target into smaller stages. For example, 8% followed by 4% is easier overall for conservative traders. Therefore, two-step plans often suit traders who build positions gradually.
Which drawdown type gives traders the best chance of passing?
Static drawdowns fixed from the initial balance are the most forgiving option. In contrast, trailing drawdowns move upward with equity peaks. As a result, they can breach during a normal intraday pullback. This can happen even if the position ultimately closes in profit. EOD trailing drawdowns only update at session close. Consequently, they sit between static and intraday trailing in terms of difficulty.
Do any of these prop firms offer free retakes on failed evaluations?
Yes, some firms do offer retake options. FundedNext offers free trading-cycle retakes under specific conditions on some Stellar plans. Similarly, The5ers Bootcamp lets traders progress through smaller phases. As a result, the financial cost of a single failure is reduced. However, retake policies change regularly. Therefore, always confirm current terms directly with each firm before purchasing.
Conclusion
Choosing an easy to pass prop firm in 2026 comes down to matching the firmās rules to your trading style. FundedNext suits traders who want maximum flexibility and news trading freedom. FTMO, on the other hand, suits those who value a long track record and a fixed drawdown structure. The5ers suits patient traders building long-term capital. Meanwhile, Funding Pips suits cost-conscious traders who want static drawdowns at the lowest price. In every case, the traders who pass most consistently treat the evaluation as they would a live account. They size positions conservatively, protect the daily drawdown above all else, and wait for setups that align with their proven strategy.
